• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
SRI logo
  • About
    • Press room
    • Our history
  • Expertise
    • Advanced imaging systems
    • Artificial intelligence
    • Biomedical R&D services
    • Biomedical sciences
    • Computer vision
    • Cyber & formal methods
    • Education and learning
    • Innovation strategy and policy
    • National security
    • Ocean & space
    • Quantum
    • QED-C
    • Robotics, sensors & devices
    • Speech & natural language
    • Video test & measurement
  • Ventures
  • NSIC
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • 日本支社
Search
Close
STEM and computer science education publications January 1, 2008

Gender Differences In Science

Citation

Copy to clipboard


Jovanovic, J., & Bhanot, R. (2008). Gender Differences in Science. In K. Tobin, & W. Roth (Vol Eds.) (Eds.) The World of Science Education: Handbook of Research in North America (Rotterdam: SensePublishers, in preparation).

Introduction

Despite years of progress toward educational equity for girls and women, there continues to be a serious gender gap in females’ participation in science. At the college level, where women represent more than half the students enrolled, they continue to be underrepresented in many math and science-related fields (National Science Foundation, 2007). The most obvious under-representation is in engineering where women earn only 20% the bachelor’s degrees. Similarly, women account for only 25% of the bachelor’s degrees in computer science and 22% of the bachelor’s degrees in physics (American Institute of Physics, 2007). Although, these percentages indicate an overall increase in the representation of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields as compared to 30 years ago, it can be argued that such increases are not good enough. Ultimately, there are considerable economic losses for girls and women because of their unequal participation in traditionally male-dominated technological fields. At the same time, there is growing concern that the US may lose its competitive edge in science and technology if we fail to increase the number of students—both males and females—involved in science. In this chapter we begin by reporting current national trends in girls’ and boys’ science performance that are traditionally highlighted as accounting for the “leaky pipeline” leading to careers in STEM fields. In the remainder of the chapter we present a review of research that looks at alternative explanations for these gender differences in science. Specifically, we consider the significance of girls’ science attitudes and the pervasive influence—both direct and indirect—of science stereotypes. We consider the research that has addressed the significance of stereotypes both in the classroom and at home, where parents’ gendered expectations about their children’s ability in academically stereotyped domains might help to explain girls’ lower confidence and interest in science.

↓ Review online

Share this

How can we help?

Once you hit send…

We’ll match your inquiry to the person who can best help you.

Expect a response within 48 hours.

Career call to action image

Make your own mark.

Search jobs

Our work

Case studies

Publications

Timeline of innovation

Areas of expertise

Institute

Leadership

Press room

Media inquiries

Compliance

Careers

Job listings

Contact

SRI Ventures

Our locations

Headquarters

333 Ravenswood Ave
Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA

+1 (650) 859-2000

Subscribe to our newsletter


日本支社
SRI International
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies
  • DMCA
  • Copyright © 2022 SRI International